In §6.6, the ideal struck string was modeled as a simple initial velocity distribution along the string, corresponding to an instantaneous transfer of linear momentum from the striking hammer into the transverse motion of a string segment at time zero. (See Fig.6.10 for a diagram of the initial traveling velocity waves.) In that model, we neglected any effect of the striking hammer after time zero, as if it had bounced away at time 0 due to a socalled elastic collision. In this section, we consider the more realistic case of an inelastic collision, i.e., where the mass hits the string and remains in contact until something, such as a wave, or gravity, causes the mass and string to separate.
For simplicity, let the string length be infinity, and denote its wave impedance by . Denote the colliding mass by and its speed prior to collision by . It will turn out in this analysis that we may approximate the size of the mass by zero (a socalled point mass). Finally, we neglect the effects of gravity and drag by the surrounding air. When the mass collides with the string, our model must switch from two separate models (massinflight and ideal string), to that of two ideal strings joined by a mass at , as depicted in Fig.9.12. The ``forcevelocity port'' connections of the mass and two semiinfinite string endpoints are formally in series because they all move together; that is, the mass velocity equals the velocity of each of the two string endpoints connected to the mass (see §7.2 for a fuller discussion of impedances and their parallel/series connection).
The equivalent circuit for the massstring assembly after time zero is shown in Fig.9.13. Note that the string wave impedance appears twice, once for each string segment on the left and right. Also note that there is a single common velocity for the two string endpoints and mass. LTI circuit elements in series can be arranged in any order.

From the equivalent circuit, it is easy to solve for the velocity . Formally, this is accomplished by applying Kirchoff's Loop Rule, which states that the sum of voltages (``forces'') around any series loop is zero:
Taking the Laplace transform^{10.10}of Eq. (9.8) yields, by linearity,
where denotes the Laplace transform of .
For the mass, we have
where we used the differentiation theorem for Laplace transforms [452, Appendix D].^{10.11}Note that the mass is characterized by its impedance
Substituting these relations into Eq. (9.9) yields
That is, an equivalent problem formulation is to start with the mass at rest and in contact with the string, followed by striking the mass with an ideal hammer (impulse) that imparts momentum to the mass at time zero. This formulation is diagrammed in Fig.9.14.

An advantage of the externalimpulse formulation is that the system has a zero initial state, so that an impedance description (§7.1) is complete. In other words, the system can be fully described as a series combination of the three impedances , (on the left), and (on the right), driven by an external forcesource .
Solving Eq. (9.10) for yields
Since the Laplace transform of is , where denotes the Heaviside unit step function,^{10.12} the velocity of the contact point is
We see that at time zero the mass velocity is , as it must be, and after that it decays exponentially to zero with timeconstant . The decay rate depends on the ratio of the mass to the string wave impedance. In particular, the heavier the mass, the slower the mass velocity decays to zero. Since , the greater the string tension or massdensity , the faster the mass velocity decays to zero.
The displacement of the string at is given by the integral of the velocity:
where we defined the initial transverse displacement as . The final displacement of the string is
Thus, the final string displacement is proportional to both the ``hammer mass'' and the initial striking velocity; it is inversely proportional to the string wave impedance .
The momentum of the mass before time zero is , and after time zero it is
The force applied to the two string endpoints by the mass is given by . From Newton's Law, , we have that momentum , delivered by the mass to the string, can be calculated as the time integral of applied force:
Thus, the momentum delivered to the string by the mass starts out at zero, and grows as a relaxing exponential to at time infinity. We see that an ideal string struck inelastically by a mass does not at all correspond to an instantaneous momentum transfer, as considered in §6.6. Instead, the mass's momentum is transferred over a period of time (in this case infinite time). This is why it is possible to approximate the mass width by zero in this analysis, unlike in the excitationbyinitialvelocity in §6.6.
In a real piano, the hammer, which strikes in an upward (grand) or sideways (upright) direction, falls away from the string a short time after collision, but it may remain in contact with the string for a substantial fraction of a period (see §9.4 on piano modeling).