It seems reasonable to expect that the tonehole should be
representable as a *load* along a waveguide bore model, thus
creating a loaded two-port junction with two identical bore ports on
either side of the tonehole. From the relations for the loaded
parallel junction (C.101), in the two-port case
with
, and considering pressure waves rather than force
waves, we have

(10.63) | |||

(10.64) | |||

(10.65) |

Thus, the loaded two-port junction can be implemented in ``one-filter form'' as shown in Fig. 9.48 with ( ) and

Comparing with (9.58), we see that the simplified Keefe tonehole model with the negative series inertance removed ( ), is equivalent to a loaded two-port waveguide junction with ,

Each series impedance
in the split-T model of
Fig. 9.43 can be modeled as a *series* waveguide
junction with a load of
. To see this, set the transmission
matrix parameters in (9.55) to the values
,
, and
from (9.51) to get

(10.66) |

where is the alpha parameter for a series loaded waveguide junction involving two impedance waveguides joined in series with each other and with a load impedance of , as can be seen from (C.99). To obtain exactly the loaded series scattering relations (C.100), we first switch to the more general convention in which the `` '' superscript denotes waves traveling

(10.67) |

Next we convert pressure to velocity using and to obtain

(10.68) |

Finally, we toggle the reference direction of port 2 (the ``current'' arrow for on port 2 in Fig. 9.43) so that velocity is positive flowing

(10.69) |

where . This is then the canonical form (C.100).

[How to cite this work] [Order a printed hardcopy] [Comment on this page via email]

Copyright ©

Center for Computer Research in Music and Acoustics (CCRMA), Stanford University