Next  |  Prev  |  Up  |  Top  |  Index  |  JOS Index  |  JOS Pubs  |  JOS Home  |  Search

In this section, scattering relations will be derived for the general case of N waveguides meeting at a load. When a load is present, the scattering is no longer lossless, unless the load itself is lossless. (i.e., its impedance has a zero real part). For , will denote a velocity wave traveling into the junction, and will be called an incoming'' velocity wave as opposed to right-going.''C.9

Consider first the series junction of waveguides containing transverse force and velocity waves. At a series junction, there is a common velocity while the forces sum. For definiteness, we may think of ideal strings intersecting at a single point, and the intersection point can be attached to a lumped load impedance , as depicted in Fig.C.29 for . The presence of the lumped load means we need to look at the wave variables in the frequency domain, i.e., for velocity waves and for force waves, where denotes the Laplace transform. In the discrete-time case, we use the transform instead, but otherwise the story is identical. The physical constraints at the junction are

 (C.90) (C.91)

where the reference direction for the load force is taken to be opposite that for the . (It can be considered the equal and opposite reaction'' force at the junction.) For a wave traveling into the junction, force is positive pulling up, acting toward the junction. When the load impedance is zero, giving a free intersection point, the junction reduces to the unloaded case, and signal scattering will be energy preserving. In general, the loaded junction is lossless if and only if re , and it is memoryless if and only if im .

The parallel junction is characterized by

 (C.92) (C.93)

For example, could be pressure in an acoustic tube and the corresponding volume velocity. In the parallel case, the junction reduces to the unloaded case when the load impedance goes to infinity.

The scattering relations for the series junction are derived as follows, dropping the common argument  ' for simplicity:

 (C.94) (C.95) (C.96)

where is the wave impedance in the th waveguide, a real, positive constant. Bringing all terms containing to the left-hand side, and solving for the junction velocity gives
 (C.97) (C.98)

(written to be valid also in the multivariable case involving square impedance matrices [437]), where

 (C.99)

Finally, from the basic relation , the outgoing velocity waves can be computed from the junction velocity and incoming velocity waves as

 (C.100)

Similarly, the scattering relations for the loaded parallel junction are given by

 (C.101)

where is the Laplace transform of the force across all elements at the junction, is the load admittance, and are the branch admittances.

It is interesting to note that the junction load is equivalent to an st waveguide having a (generalized) wave impedance given by the load impedance. This makes sense when one recalls that a transmission line can be perfectly terminated'' (i.e., suppressing all reflections from the termination) using a lumped resistor equal in value to the wave impedance of the transmission line. Thus, as far as a traveling wave is concerned, there is no difference between a wave impedance and a lumped impedance of the same value.

Subsections
Next  |  Prev  |  Up  |  Top  |  Index  |  JOS Index  |  JOS Pubs  |  JOS Home  |  Search

[How to cite this work]  [Order a printed hardcopy]  [Comment on this page via email]