Next |
Prev |
Up |
Top
|
Index |
JOS Index |
JOS Pubs |
JOS Home |
Search
Comb filters get their name from the ``comb-like'' appearance of their
amplitude response (gain versus frequency), as shown in
Figures 2.25, 2.26, and 2.27.
For a review of frequency-domain analysis
of digital filters, see, e.g., [452].
Figure:
Amplitude responses of the
feed forward comb-filter
(diagrammed in Fig.2.23) with
and
,
, and
.
a) Linear amplitude scale. b) Decibel scale. The frequency axis goes
from 0 to the sampling rate (instead of only half the
sampling rate, which is more typical for real filters) in order to
display the fact that the number of notches is exactly
(as
opposed to ``
'').
|
The transfer function of the feedforward comb filter Eq.(2.2) is
|
(3.3) |
so that the amplitude response (gain versus frequency) is
|
(3.4) |
This is plotted in Fig.2.25 for
,
, and
,
, and
.
When
, we get the simplified result
In this case, we obtain
nulls, which are points
(frequencies) of zero gain in the amplitude response. Note that in
flangers, these nulls are moved slowly over time by
modulating the delay length
. Doing this smoothly requires
interpolated delay lines (see Chapter 4 and
Chapter 5).
Next |
Prev |
Up |
Top
|
Index |
JOS Index |
JOS Pubs |
JOS Home |
Search
[How to cite this work] [Order a printed hardcopy] [Comment on this page via email]