Next: Type III: Mixed Mesh
Up: The Waveguide Mesh
Previous: Type I: Voltage-centered Mesh
This arrangement is the dual to the previous case. We now set
and
We then have
![$\displaystyle v_{0}\geq \max_{2(k+p)\hspace{0.05in}{\rm odd}}\left(\sqrt{\frac{2}{l_{k,p}c_{k,p}}}\right)$](img1626.png) |
(4.79) |
for half-integer
and
.
It is rather interesting that in (2+1)D, if we have
and
, this arrangement (and not that of type I) allows the series junctions to be treated as throughs (with sign inversion). We may thus operate at a reduced sample rate in this case. This particular choice of immittances, in the constant-coefficient, lossless and source-free case with
, yields the original form of the waveguide mesh proposed in [198], and mentioned in §4.2.7. We also note that networks such as this and type I, for which the connecting immittances may vary spatially have also been explored in TLM [29,159].
Next: Type III: Mixed Mesh
Up: The Waveguide Mesh
Previous: Type I: Voltage-centered Mesh
Stefan Bilbao
2002-01-22