Next |
Prev |
Up |
Top
|
Index |
JOS Index |
JOS Pubs |
JOS Home |
Search
It is straightforward to extend the above computational model to
include the rotating woofer port (``baffle'') and wooden cabinet
enclosure as follows:
- In [190], it is mentioned that an AM ``throb'' is
the main effect of the rotating woofer port. A modulated
lowpass-filter cut-off frequency has been used for this purpose by
others. Measured data can be used to construct angle-dependent
filtering in a manner analogous to that of the rotating horn, and this
``woofer filter'' runs in parallel with the rotating horn model.
- The Leslie cabinet multiply-reflects the sound emanating from
the rotating horn. The first few early reflections are simply handled
as additional sources in Fig.5.6.
- To qualitatively simulate later, more reverberant
reflections in the Leslie cabinet, we may feed a portion of the
rotating-horn and speaker-port signals to separate states of an
artificial reverberator (see Chapter 3). This reverberator
may be configured as a ``very small room'' corresponding to the
dimensions and scattering characteristics of the Leslie cabinet, and
details of the response may be calibrated using measurements of the
impulse response of the Leslie cabinet. Finally, in order to emulate
the natural spatial diversity of a radiating Leslie cabinet in a room,
``virtual cabinet vent outputs'' can be extracted from the model and
fed into separate states of a room reverberator. An alternative
time-varying FIR filtering approach based on cabinet impulse-response
measurements over a range of horn angles is described in [192].
In summary, we may use multiple interpolating write-pointers to
individually simulate the early cabinet reflections, and a ``Leslie
cabinet'' reverberator for handling later reflections more
statistically.
Next |
Prev |
Up |
Top
|
Index |
JOS Index |
JOS Pubs |
JOS Home |
Search
[How to cite this work] [Order a printed hardcopy] [Comment on this page via email]