Next |
Prev |
Up |
Top
|
Index |
JOS Index |
JOS Pubs |
JOS Home |
Search
Figure 1.20 shows a family of feedback-comb-filter
amplitude responses, obtained using a selection of feedback
coefficients.
Figure 1.20:
Amplitude response of the feedback
comb-filter
(Fig. 1.18 with and
) with and , , and . a) Linear
amplitude scale. b) Decibel scale.
|
Figure 1.21 shows a similar family obtained using
negated feedback coefficients; the opposite sign of the feedback
exchanges the peaks and valleys in the amplitude response.
Figure 1.21:
Amplitude response of the phase-inverted feedback comb-filter, i.e., as in Fig. 1.20 with negated
, , and .
a) Linear amplitude scale. b) Decibel scale.
|
As introduced in §1.6.2 above, a class of feedback comb
filters can be defined as any difference equation of the form
Taking the z transform of both sides and solving for
,
the transfer function of the feedback comb filter is found to be
|
(2.5) |
so that the amplitude response is
This is plotted in Fig. 1.20 for and , , and
. Figure 1.21 shows the same case but with the feedback
sign-inverted.
For , the feedback-comb amplitude response
reduces to
and for to
which exactly inverts the amplitude response of the feedforward
comb filter with gain (Eq. (1.4)).
Note that produces resonant peaks at
while for , the peaks occur midway between these values.
Next |
Prev |
Up |
Top
|
Index |
JOS Index |
JOS Pubs |
JOS Home |
Search
[How to cite and copy this work]