regex (7)
NAME
regex - POSIX 1003.2 regular expressions
DESCRIPTION
Regular expressions (``RE''s), as defined in POSIX 1003.2, come in two
forms: modern REs (roughly those of egrep; 1003.2 calls these
``extended'' REs) and obsolete REs (roughly those of ed(1); 1003.2
``basic'' REs). Obsolete REs mostly exist for backward compatibility
in some old programs; they will be discussed at the end. 1003.2 leaves
some aspects of RE syntax and semantics open; `(!)' marks decisions on
these aspects that may not be fully portable to other 1003.2 implemen-
tations.
A (modern) RE is one(!) or more non-empty(!) branches, separated by
`|'. It matches anything that matches one of the branches.
A branch is one(!) or more pieces, concatenated. It matches a match
for the first, followed by a match for the second, etc.
A piece is an atom possibly followed by a single(!) `*', `+', `?', or
bound. An atom followed by `*' matches a sequence of 0 or more matches
of the atom. An atom followed by `+' matches a sequence of 1 or more
matches of the atom. An atom followed by `?' matches a sequence of 0
or 1 matches of the atom.
A bound is `{' followed by an unsigned decimal integer, possibly fol-
lowed by `,' possibly followed by another unsigned decimal integer,
always followed by `}'. The integers must lie between 0 and RE_DUP_MAX
(255(!)) inclusive, and if there are two of them, the first may not
exceed the second. An atom followed by a bound containing one integer
i and no comma matches a sequence of exactly i matches of the atom. An
atom followed by a bound containing one integer i and a comma matches a
sequence of i or more matches of the atom. An atom followed by a bound
containing two integers i and j matches a sequence of i through j
(inclusive) matches of the atom.
An atom is a regular expression enclosed in `()' (matching a match for
the regular expression), an empty set of `()' (matching the null
string)(!), a bracket expression (see below), `.' (matching any single
character), `^' (matching the null string at the beginning of a line),
`$' (matching the null string at the end of a line), a `\' followed by
one of the characters `^.[$()|*+?{\' (matching that character taken as
an ordinary character), a `\' followed by any other character(!)
(matching that character taken as an ordinary character, as if the `\'
had not been present(!)), or a single character with no other signifi-
cance (matching that character). A `{' followed by a character other
than a digit is an ordinary character, not the beginning of a bound(!).
It is illegal to end an RE with `\'.
A bracket expression is a list of characters enclosed in `[]'. It nor-
mally matches any single character from the list (but see below). If
the list begins with `^', it matches any single character (but see
below) not from the rest of the list. If two characters in the list
are separated by `-', this is shorthand for the full range of charac-
ters between those two (inclusive) in the collating sequence, e.g.
and some combinations using `[' (see next paragraphs), all other spe-
cial characters, including `\', lose their special significance within
a bracket expression.
Within a bracket expression, a collating element (a character, a multi-
character sequence that collates as if it were a single character, or a
collating-sequence name for either) enclosed in `[.' and `.]' stands
for the sequence of characters of that collating element. The sequence
is a single element of the bracket expression's list. A bracket
expression containing a multi-character collating element can thus
match more than one character, e.g. if the collating sequence includes
a `ch' collating element, then the RE `[[.ch.]]*c' matches the first
five characters of `chchcc'.
Within a bracket expression, a collating element enclosed in `[=' and
`=]' is an equivalence class, standing for the sequences of characters
of all collating elements equivalent to that one, including itself.
(If there are no other equivalent collating elements, the treatment is
as if the enclosing delimiters were `[.' and `.]'.) For example, if o
and ^ are the members of an equivalence class, then `[[=o=]]',
`[[=^=]]', and `[o^]' are all synonymous. An equivalence class may
not(!) be an endpoint of a range.
Within a bracket expression, the name of a character class enclosed in
`[:' and `:]' stands for the list of all characters belonging to that
class. Standard character class names are:
alnum digit punct
alpha graph space
blank lower upper
cntrl print xdigit
These stand for the character classes defined in wctype(3). A locale
may provide others. A character class may not be used as an endpoint
of a range.
There are two special cases(!) of bracket expressions: the bracket
expressions `[[:<:]]' and `[[:>:]]' match the null string at the begin-
ning and end of a word respectively. A word is defined as a sequence
of word characters which is neither preceded nor followed by word char-
acters. A word character is an alnum character (as defined by
wctype(3)) or an underscore. This is an extension, compatible with but
not specified by POSIX 1003.2, and should be used with caution in soft-
ware intended to be portable to other systems.
In the event that an RE could match more than one substring of a given
string, the RE matches the one starting earliest in the string. If the
RE could match more than one substring starting at that point, it
matches the longest. Subexpressions also match the longest possible
substrings, subject to the constraint that the whole match be as long
as possible, with subexpressions starting earlier in the RE taking pri-
ority over ones starting later. Note that higher-level subexpressions
thus take priority over their lower-level component subexpressions.
Match lengths are measured in characters, not collating elements. A
null string is considered longer than no match at all. For example,
`bb*' matches the three middle characters of `abbbc',
a bracket expression, it is effectively transformed into a bracket
expression containing both cases, e.g. `x' becomes `[xX]'. When it
appears inside a bracket expression, all case counterparts of it are
added to the bracket expression, so that (e.g.) `[x]' becomes `[xX]'
and `[^x]' becomes `[^xX]'.
No particular limit is imposed on the length of REs(!). Programs
intended to be portable should not employ REs longer than 256 bytes, as
an implementation can refuse to accept such REs and remain POSIX-com-
pliant.
Obsolete (``basic'') regular expressions differ in several respects.
`|', `+', and `?' are ordinary characters and there is no equivalent
for their functionality. The delimiters for bounds are `\{' and `\}',
with `{' and `}' by themselves ordinary characters. The parentheses
for nested subexpressions are `\(' and `\)', with `(' and `)' by them-
selves ordinary characters. `^' is an ordinary character except at the
beginning of the RE or(!) the beginning of a parenthesized subexpres-
sion, `$' is an ordinary character except at the end of the RE or(!)
the end of a parenthesized subexpression, and `*' is an ordinary char-
acter if it appears at the beginning of the RE or the beginning of a
parenthesized subexpression (after a possible leading `^'). Finally,
there is one new type of atom, a back reference: `\' followed by a non-
zero decimal digit d matches the same sequence of characters matched by
the dth parenthesized subexpression (numbering subexpressions by the
positions of their opening parentheses, left to right), so that (e.g.)
`\([bc]\)\1' matches `bb' or `cc' but not `bc'.
SEE ALSO
regex(3)
POSIX 1003.2, section 2.8 (Regular Expression Notation).
BUGS
Having two kinds of REs is a botch.
The current 1003.2 spec says that `)' is an ordinary character in the
absence of an unmatched `('; this was an unintentional result of a
wording error, and change is likely. Avoid relying on it.
Back references are a dreadful botch, posing major problems for effi-
cient implementations. They are also somewhat vaguely defined (does
`a\(\(b\)*\2\)*d' match `abbbd'?). Avoid using them.
1003.2's specification of case-independent matching is vague. The
``one case implies all cases'' definition given above is current con-
sensus among implementors as to the right interpretation.
The syntax for word boundaries is incredibly ugly.
AUTHOR
This page was taken from Henry Spencer's regex package.
1994-02-07 regex(7)