rename (2)





NAME

       rename - change the name or location of a file


SYNOPSIS

       #include <stdio.h>

       int rename(const char *oldpath, const char *newpath);


DESCRIPTION

       rename renames a file, moving it between directories if required.

       Any  other  hard links to the file (as created using link(2)) are unaf-
       fected.

       If newpath already exists it will be atomically replaced (subject to  a
       few  conditions - see ERRORS below), so that there is no point at which
       another process attempting to access newpath will find it missing.

       If newpath exists but the operation fails for some reason rename  guar-
       antees to leave an instance of newpath in place.

       However, when overwriting there will probably be a window in which both
       oldpath and newpath refer to the file being renamed.

       If oldpath refers to a symbolic link the link is  renamed;  if  newpath
       refers to a symbolic link the link will be overwritten.


RETURN VALUE

       On  success,  zero is returned.  On error, -1 is returned, and errno is
       set appropriately.


ERRORS

       EISDIR newpath is an existing directory, but oldpath is  not  a  direc-
              tory.

       EXDEV  oldpath and newpath are not on the same filesystem.

       ENOTEMPTY or EEXIST
              newpath  is  a non-empty directory, i.e., contains entries other
              than "." and "..".

       EBUSY  The rename fails because oldpath or newpath is a directory  that
              is in use by some process (perhaps as current working directory,
              or as root directory, or because it was open for reading) or  is
              in  use  by  the  system (for example as mount point), while the
              system considers this an error.  (Note that there is no require-
              ment to return EBUSY in such cases - there is nothing wrong with
              doing the rename anyway - but it is allowed to return  EBUSY  if
              the system cannot otherwise handle such situations.)

       EINVAL The  new  pathname  contained a path prefix of the old, or, more
              generally, an attempt was made to make a directory  a  subdirec-
              tory of itself.

       EMLINK oldpath already has the maximum number of links to it, or it was

       EACCES Write access to the directory containing oldpath or  newpath  is
              not  allowed  for  the  process's  effective  uid, or one of the
              directories in oldpath or newpath did not allow search (execute)
              permission,  or  oldpath was a directory and did not allow write
              permission (needed to update the ..  entry).

       EPERM or EACCES
              The directory containing oldpath has the sticky bit set and  the
              process's  effective  uid is neither that of root nor the uid of
              the file to be deleted nor that of the directory containing  it,
              or  newpath  is an existing file and the directory containing it
              has the sticky bit set and the process's effective uid  is  nei-
              ther  that  of  root  nor the uid of the file to be replaced nor
              that of the directory containing it, or the filesystem  contain-
              ing pathname does not support renaming of the type requested.

       ENAMETOOLONG
              oldpath or newpath was too long.

       ENOENT A  directory component in oldpath  or  newpath does not exist or
              is a dangling symbolic link.

       ENOMEM Insufficient kernel memory was available.

       EROFS  The file is on a read-only filesystem.

       ELOOP  Too many symbolic links were encountered in resolving oldpath or
              newpath.

       ENOSPC The device containing the file has no room for the new directory
              entry.


CONFORMING TO

       POSIX, 4.3BSD, ANSI C


BUGS

       On NFS filesystems, you can not assume that if the operation failed the
       file was not renamed.  If the server does the rename operation and then
       crashes, the retransmitted RPC which will be processed when the  server
       is up again causes a failure.  The application is expected to deal with
       this.  See link(2) for a similar problem.


SEE ALSO

       link(2), unlink(2), symlink(2), mv(1)

Linux 2.0                         1998-06-04                         rename(2)