From this week’s reading, I want to respond to the corollary to Principle 1.1, which states that “anything worth designing is worth designing beautifully”, and further describes design as an “act of alignment” between the pragmatic and the beautiful.
We discussed in class how design is around us in our everyday lives: most objects we encounter in our urbanized, industrialized world have been designed (whether intentionally or not) by a person at some point. I recently moved into my first apartment, and, in the process of acquiring all the things I need (who knew can openers didn’t just spawn in the back of kitchen drawers?!), I realized both just how many objects are available to us– through purchase, gift or sidewalk reconnaissance– and how few of them are designed to engage the user on an aesthetic and emotional level. Most of the dishtowels, or placemats, or spoons, or toilet brush holders, that are readily available to the average American consumer seem to primarily focus on functionality, seeking aesthetic neutrality (if they consider aesthetics at all). These objects are not meant to be loved, pondered, or laughed at; they are meant to serve, and then to be disposed of. Americans today produce an astronomical amount of waste and cycle through objects more quickly than ever before; at the same time, they experience fewer personal connections and feel lonelier than ever before. I find myself wondering if the lack of beautifully designed objects is both a reflection and driver of a lack of beautifully aligned relationships. If all things worth designing were designed beautifully, would we build stronger connections to our surroundings, and the people in them? If I admired my kitchen table for its strong joints and cozy chairs, would I think of it as less disposable and replaceable? Would I be more likely to sit around it and talk with my friends?
Creating beautifully aligned designs comes, of course, with deep challenges. Cost is a major factor at every step: the designer of my spatula is bogged down with projects and, facing budget restrictions, chooses grey plastic for its affordability and ease of manufacturing, and its low price appeals to me, a grad student with destructive roommates. I will use it for a few years and, when the cheap gray plastic starts splintering off into my food, I will throw it into the landfill and buy another cheap gray spatula, reasoning that, based on my experience with the first, non-durable spatula, kitchen utensils break after a few years and I shouldn’t invest too much money into them. Inertia is another stalling force. Alignment takes effort, and we are all. So. Busy. Design patterns easily slide into design strictures.
In response to all this, I’ve tried to become more conscious and considered with the things I bring into my life. Before I put something in cart, or pull over and throw it in the back of my car, I ask myself: what is its function? Do I find it beautiful? Is it unique? How will it fit in my space? Am I attached enough to it to keep it? For how long? Where will it go when I am done with it? Similarly, I hope to design things that can hold both a practical and personal place in the lives of others.
OBJECT 1: My watch
OBJECT 2: My Yeti Tumbler
OBJECT 3: Clip laundry hanger
I put design effort into this webpage, using HTML and CSS to change the fonts, colors and alignments.