220b-winter-2013/final project

From CCRMA Wiki

(Difference between revisions)
Jump to: navigation, search
(Final Project)
(Part 3: Critique (due Tuesday, 3/19))
Line 24: Line 24:
* after the final presentations, choose two of your classmates' projects
* after the final presentations, choose two of your classmates' projects
* write a one page critique of each illustrating strengths and weaknesses
* write a one page critique of each illustrating strengths and weaknesses
-
 
+
* Various resources on critique writing:
 +
** [http://www.dartmouth.edu/~writing/materials/student/humanities/music.shtml The Challenges of Writing About Music]
 +
** [http://www.iup.edu/honors/page.aspx?id=27011 Writing a Music Critique]
 +
** [http://www.gregsandow.com/old/juilliard_crit_review_notes_2000.htm How to Write a Review]
 +
** [http://www.salon.com/2012/08/18/how_to_write_a_bad_review/ How to Write a Bad Review]
== Deliverables ==
== Deliverables ==

Revision as of 16:52, 1 March 2013

Contents

Final Project

Image:beam-us-up.jpg

...

Due date

  • (presentation / demo / performance) : Tuesday 3/12, 10-12:00am CCRMA Stage
  • Setup will begin at 8:30 so please come early!
  • Breakfast will be provided so invite your friends!!!


Part 1: Open-Ended Project

  • as discussed in class, the final project is open-ended
  • work on something your interested in and have fun!


Part 2: Show it / Perform It

  • aim for 5-10 minute per piece (though your fully designed live performance can be longer)
  • keep in mind setup/transition time
  • final presentations + performances


Part 3: Critique (due Tuesday, 3/19)

Deliverables

turn in all files by putting them in your Library/Web/220b/project/ directory, and then linking to them from your Library/Web/220b/final.html - and submitting the link to Takako, Rob, and Spencer

  • 1) source code + sound files for your performance
  • 2) written documentation (and any program notes / bios)
  • 3) your final.html should link to these files
  • 4) a presentation/demo or live performance of the piece

And, to be submitted separately via email to Takako, Rob, and Spencer:

  • 5) a critique of two of the performances/demos
Personal tools