Next |
Prev |
Up |
Top
|
JOS Index |
JOS Pubs |
JOS Home |
Search
- Observations come in a finite interval, say
. So far
we haven't considered the range of the error-summation
(2). Writing the model equation (1) for
every
and collecting the equations in a single
matrix-vector equation gives:
where
- Assuming
has full row rank, there exists a unique solution
for the PSD-minimal least-squares criterion 2, namely the
standard one:
Let
for the remainder of these notes.
The proof is deferred to an Appendix.
is singular iff
is rank
deficient, in which case optimal
exist, but are no longer
unique. To simplify we assume
is nonsingular.
- The problem is that
are outside the observation
window. Usually, this problem is addressed by one of three windowing
methods:
- Covariance method
Delete columns of
(and corresponding
elements of
) until no data is accessed outside
,
to obtain:
- Prewindowed method
Set the inaccessible data at the beginning of the observation window
to zero. Since the first column of
is
identically zero, we delete it (and the corresponding element in
)
because it offers no useful information.
- Autocorrelation method
Window the data symmetrically at both ends, setting inaccessible
elements
,
to zero:
- Remarks
- The covariance method has the least bias and should be used
whenever conditions allow. Any windowing has the effect of
smoothing spectral peaks, causing pole estimates to be over
damped.
- The autocorrelation method involves the most windowing, but
the following properties hold:
- The pre-windowed method simplifies the development of
adaptive lattice algorithms, which update the least squares
solution recursively in time (
) and in the
order (
). It is easiest to develop the
covariance lattice method as an extension of the pre-windowed method.
Next |
Prev |
Up |
Top
|
JOS Index |
JOS Pubs |
JOS Home |
Search
Download lattice.pdf
Download lattice_2up.pdf