Next |
Prev |
Top
|
REALSIMPLE Top
Here we develop a very simplified digital waveguide model of waves propagating
in a flute. The far end of the flute from the player's mouth has an open end,
so to first approximation, pressure waves reflect with a sign inversion from
the far end. Flutists can shorten the effective length of the tube by opening
holes along the length of the tube. The effective length then corresponds to
the first open hole. In contrast with the clarinet, saxophone, etc., the end
of the flute near the player's mouth, which is known as the head, behaves acoustically more like an open
end than a closed end [3]. This is because a flute player only places the lower
lip against the embouchure hole--he or she does NOT completely cover the
hole. Consequently, pressure waves reflect with a sign inversion at the head of the flute.
The simplified model is shown in Figure 1. We use the same basic structure as
with the vibrating string in the digital waveguide model laboratory assignment,
although this is somewhat
coincidental because here we are modeling sound pressure waves
rather than structural displacement waves. The total delay of samples
around the loop corresponds to the note being played. Since both terminations
support inverting reflections, the fundamental frequency
where
is the digital sampling interval in seconds. To make sure that waves
circulating in the waveguide decay over time, we change one of the gains from
to where but . So that the higher harmonics
decay more quickly than the lower harmonics, we insert a lowpass filter into
the feedback loop (see Figure 1) [4].
Next |
Prev |
Top
|
REALSIMPLE Top
Download vir_flute.pdf